November 13, 2013

The functions (and liabilities) of hazing

I don’t wan this blog to be dominated by news about sports teams, as they are only one type of team and are not representative of most of the teams that are in the work world. However recent news events from the sports world do periodically provide great opportunities for us to reflect on teams in general, what makes them work, what we expect of team leaders, etc.
Just this past week there has been a flurry of information about hazing in the American National Football League (NFL). For those of you who haven’t followed the story; Jonathan Martin, a player for the Miami Dolphins, threw down his tray in the team cafeteria and left the team practices without speaking to anyone after being the butt end of what some on the team describe as a series of pranks. These “pranks” reportedly ranged from the use of racial slurs and epithets (Martin is black), a staged event where multiple white team members got up and left the table as soon as Martin sat down, and a series of text messages from one team member in particular (Richie Incognito) that included a variety of threats to Martin and his family.
On the sports radio channels, there have been a lot of people calling in and giving their opinions on whether or not the actions by Incognito and other team members or the reactions by Martin are appropriate given this particular context and the “macho” culture of an NFL team.  While many people (and radio hosts) condemn the actions of Incognito in particular; others also condemn the reactions of Martin, stating that he should just accept this as a natural part of the “hazing” that occurs in this type of culture, and that these types of actions are designed to test the “mental toughness” of new players.
I have never played professional football, so I won’t try to speak with authority on the culture within an NFL team, what is or is not appropriate language, etc. I will however talk about the use and function of “hazing” rituals within teams, as these rituals happen in all sorts of different organizations.
Hazing rituals play a valuable role in organizations. They communicate important information about group norms and expectations, establish and enforce status hierarchies, and reinforce key values. But most importantly, these rituals establish a sense of community. In an organization where people enter as a cohort group (for example a fraternity or sorority, or a military boot camp), the hazing rituals help to establish bonds between the members of the cohort as they all go through the experience together.  In other organizations where members enter one at a time, these rituals reinforce that the individual is a junior member of the team; and that while senior members of the team will engage in this hazing of the junior member, they will also protect that junior member of the team from significant threats coming from outside the team.
These rituals are not intended to test the “mental toughness” of team members; and there is an important reason for that. The actions of Incognito and others served to isolate Martin, which does indeed “test” one’s mental toughness. Isolation is used as an interrogation tactic by police, military and intelligence units as a way to break down an individual. In order to build a team, however, you do not want your team members to feel isolated. You want them instead to always believe that they can always count on their team members for help and support. This way, they become more comfortable engaging in risky behavior (for example, putting one’s body in front of multiple 270 pound defensive ends) and committing themselves to the goals of the team, knowing that in turn the other members of the team will protect them.
Sigmund Freud, the founder of modern psychology, made a very interesting point about the importance of feeling like you are a part of a larger unit. In Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Freud commented that most military leaders felt that the perception of panic within a military unit led to the dissolution of the unit, and that therefore one must act directly to reassure the members of the unit that they would be successful. Freud however noted that this thinking was backwards. It isn’t that panic leads to the dissolution of the unit. Instead, it is that the realization that we are not in fact a single unit that leads to the perception of panic. From the beginning of human history, one of our biggest advantages against predators that were larger, stronger and faster than us was that we were able to coordinate our collective efforts to act as a single unit, a team if you will. When we act as a team, we become bigger and stronger, and better able to deal with a variety of external threats.

Therefore from the perspective of the Miami Dolphins, the biggest problem with this incident is not that there may be one individual player who is treating others badly, or even that there may be problems with racism within the team. The biggest problem is that there are behaviors going on that are designed to isolate individual players, preventing them from integrating with the team. And when that happens, you are always going to be playing at least one man short.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How to Build Team Trust When Everything Feels Uncertain

Inspired by HBR’s “How Leaders Can Build Stakeholder Trust in Uncertain Times” Uncertainty is no longer a temporary condition—it’s the new n...